The manuscripts are primarily evaluated by our internal screeners who check the articles for any methodological flaws, format, and their compliance with the journal’s focus and scope. Employing a double-blind peer review, the articles will be reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers and additional reviewers where it deems necessary. Their comments will be passed on to the authors and their responses to the comments along with the reviewers’ comments will then be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board. The final review process will be discussed in the editorial board sessions. Based on the comments, and the journal’s focus and scope, the Editor-in-Chief will decide which articles should be published.